Skip to content
Tuesday 25 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,886.16
+0.29%
DAX
26,266.14
+0.61%
CAC 40
8,439.20
-0.16%
STOXX 50
6,455.63
+0.12%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Thursday 18 April 2019 8:12 am  |  Updated:  Monday 03 June 2019 12:56 am

DEBATE: Is it right for Shamima Begum to receive legal aid for her citizenship appeal?

By: John Oxley and Luke Gittos

Add as a preferred source on Google

Is it right for Shamima Begum to receive legal aid for her citizenship appeal?

John Oxley, a barrister at Vardags, says YES.

When William Joyce was captured after six years of aiding the Nazis, he was hanged for treason. He was, however, first provided with lawyers and allowed to exhaust all avenues of appeal.

At Nuremberg, the architects of the Holocaust faced trial – represented by their lawyers.

I care very little whether those who joined the Islamic State spend the rest of their days exiled from this country or confined to a prison cell. Isis was a barbarous operation that committed genocide against the Yazidis and plotted to bring death and chaos to our own streets.

It is wrong to pretend that anyone who joined was naive to its murderous words, actions, and worldview.

Their fates, however, should be meted out justly. That includes the right to a defence, paid for by the state if necessary.

This is not about them or the awfulness of what they did. It is about us, our values, and what makes us different from the evil we fight against.

Read more: Shamima Begum got what she wanted: a one-way ticket out of British society

Luke Gittos, a lawyer, legal editor at Spiked Online, and author of Human Rights – Illusory Freedom, says NO.

Shamima Begum’s case is complicated. There is a strong argument that it requires careful consideration by the courts. Nonetheless, the outcry over granting her legal aid is entirely understandable.

Legal aid is on its knees. Criminal defendants, who are our fellow citizens, have to pay through the nose to defend allegations that they may be entirely innocent of.

Begum renounced her citizenship by leaving to fight for Isis. The same arguments for funding the representation of our citizens should not immediately extend to those who have openly declared war on our country.

Her case will cost little and is of public interest, especially with lots more Isis fighters now returning. But this is not just about money. This woman stands to benefit from the social provision that she openly denounced.

I am not surprised that this irks people. We are prioritising the rights of hostile combatants over the rights of our citizens. Our legal aid system needs to, at least, reconsider its priorities.

 

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Business
  • Legal
  • Opinion
  • Politics

Related Topics

Trending Articles

  • Andy Burnham hints at tax rises in Autumn Budget

  • Budget 2026: Which taxes will Burnham and Healey hike?

  • Can debt-ridden Morrisons become a Big Four supermarket again?

  • As it happened: Stocks rally; US to unveil ‘economic D-Day’ Iran sanctions

  • Burnham shelves Thames Water administration plans over costs

More from Morning Wire

  • Top court ‘opens the floodgates’ for part-time workers’ claims

    Lawsuit
    Supreme Court building under clear sky, symbolizing justice and authority, relevant to recent judicial news coverage
  • Watchdog takes aim at lawyers blaming juniors for AI blunders

    Legal
    Thousands of justice staff disciplined over the last three years
  • Gatwick expansion green-lit as court throws out activists’ appeal

    Transport & Infrastructure
    20m passengers have flown through Gatwick this year
  • Luton Airport expansion set for take-off after environmental challenge dismissed

    Transport & Infrastructure
    Luton Airport aerial view with planes, runways, and terminal buildings, highlighting busy travel hub operations
  • Prince Harry hit with £9.5m Daily Mail legal bill

    Legal
    Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, in a navy suit, white shirt, and striped tie, looking down.
  • Trainees ‘exploiting’ aspiring lawyers by monetising advice on social media

    Legal
    Smartphone screen displaying Social Media folder with Facebook, WeChat, Telegram, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat app icons.
  • Meta glasses court ban sparks privacy warning for City businesses

    Legal
    Mark Zuckerberg smiling while adjusting smart glasses on his face, wearing a black shirt and two wristbands
  • Litigation funders need certainty to keep Britain’s class action regime fair

    Opinion
    UK Supreme Court building, London, with intricate stone carvings and statues, under a blue sky
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook