Skip to content
Monday 10 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,901.09
+0.31%
DAX
26,319.45
+0.69%
CAC 40
8,714.93
0.00%
STOXX 50
6,523.86
+0.33%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Thursday 30 May 2019 8:07 am  |  Updated:  Monday 17 June 2019 10:19 pm

DEBATE: Was it right for Labour to expel Alastair Campbell because he voted for the Liberal Democrats?

By: James A Smith and Finn McRedmond

Add as a preferred source on Google

Was it right for Labour to expel Alastair Campbell because he voted for the Liberal Democrats?

James A. Smith, author of Other People’s Politics: Populism to Corbynism, says YES.

In 2016, in an attempt to prevent Jeremy Corbyn from being re-elected, Labour party officials began invoking obscure rules about conduct deemed irreconcilable with party membership.

At great expense, the social media of Corbyn-supporting members was trawled, and people were expelled for having been rude about councillors, for posting on Facebook that they “f*cking love the Foo Fighters”, and – most commonly – for having supported the Greens in previous elections.

Some of us felt that modern party membership should allow for some promiscuity, and that defectors should be welcomed. We were overruled.

Now, due process requires that Alastair Campbell is expelled for publicising his vote for the Lib Dems.

Beyond that, we should remember that the Iraq War is a human tragedy, built on bigger lies than the Brexit vote. Those who have found their judgement so impaired by their feelings about Brexit that they now plead special treatment for one of its architects need to take a look in the mirror.

Read more: Alastair Campbell expelled from the Labour Party

Finn McRedmond, staff writer at Reaction, says NO.

Labour’s expulsion of Alastair Campbell reveals a party struggling with its priorities.

The argument is that Campbell directly broke Labour’s rules, although Mike Creighton – Labour’s former head of compliance – has since disputed this. It may well be a grey area in terms of Labour’s internal governance.

But what is not a grey area is this: the Labour party cited its rulebook and expelled Campbell for voting Lib Dem just a day after he announced it. In contrast, it took two years for Labour to reluctantly expel the Momentum vice chair for her antisemitic remarks.

Moreover, a week after nine MPs left Labour citing antisemitism in the party as the reason for their defection, the MP Chris Williamson told activists that Labour – a party under investigation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission – had been “too apologetic” about the prejudice towards its Jewish members. A party which can dip into its rule book to expel Campbell more easily than Williamson is not a party with its priorities in order.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Politics

Related Topics

  • Brexit
  • Facebook
  • Jeremy Corbyn
  • People

Trending Articles

  • Burnham facing calls to cut employment red tape as job seekers grow for 41 months

  • Government to inject millions into electric vehicle firms despite mandate backlash

  • Silence Therapeutics to Host Conference Call and Webcast to Discuss Topline Results from Phase 2 SANRECO Trial of Divesiran in Polycythemia Vera

  • Stop burying us in swollen corporate reports, says audit watchdog boss

  • Hargreaves Lansdown orders staff back to office

More from Morning Wire

  • On this day: the birth of Michael Foot

    Opinion
    Michael Foot speaking at a public rally in a city square with a large crowd and buildings in the background.
  • Has Nigel Farage peaked too soon?

    Opinion
    Nigel Farage delivering a speech in July 2026, wearing a suit, addressing an audience at a political event.
  • Brits say Burnham should call an election

    Politics
    Number 10 Downing Street entrance with iconic black door, symbolizing British political power and leadership
  • Farage quits to stand in ‘people versus establishment’ by-election

    Politics
    George Cottrell and Nigel Farage engaging in a conversation at a political event, both dressed in formal attire.
  • The debate: should voting be compulsory?

    Opinion
    Ipsos Mori is one of the largest polling companies operating in the UK.
  • Exclusive: Government to reject Reform’s offer to cover Farage by-election cost

    Politics
    Nigel Farage speaking at a podium, dressed in a suit, addressing an audience at a business conference event
  • The Debate: should Andy Burnham have made a woman his Chancellor?

    Opinion
    Rachel Reeves delivering a speech at a press event, wearing a navy blazer and standing in front of a backdrop with logos.
  • Voters expect Burnham to hike taxes

    Politics
    Andy Burnham discussing capital gains tax increase during a press conference, highlighting potential economic impacts
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook