Skip to content
Monday 17 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,750.11
-0.21%
DAX
26,440.31
0.00%
CAC 40
8,636.80
0.00%
STOXX 50
6,539.59
0.00%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Tuesday 15 January 2019 8:17 am  |  Updated:  Monday 03 June 2019 2:12 am

DEBATE: If Theresa May’s deal fails to pass, is another referendum the best way to break the stalemate?

By: Jo Swinson and Ruth Lea

Add as a preferred source on Google

If Theresa May’s deal fails to pass, is another referendum the best way to break the stalemate?

Jo Swinson MP, deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, says YES.

Brexit has become a national embarrassment. In the last few weeks, the Conservative government has lost control in parliament, and the Labour frontbench – supposedly the official opposition – is asleep at the wheel.

So many of the Leave campaign’s promises have been broken. Brexit will make us poorer; it will hurt our NHS; and it will put our country’s security at risk.

The Prime Minister’s deal is a bad deal. It pleases no one, and would leave us as rule-takers, rather than rule-makers. It pales in comparison to the benefits and influence we have currently, as members of the European Union. And it is pure fantasy to suggest that some other brilliant Brexit can be wished into existence by Tory or Labour Brexiteers.

Regardless of whether the Prime Minister’s deal is voted through today, the public must have the opportunity to choose a better future for their children and for the country. This is why we need a people’s vote, to give the public the final say on the deal with the option to remain in the EU.

Ruth Lea, economic adviser to the Arbuthnot Banking Group, says NO.

Prior to the 2016 referendum, the government was unequivocal that it would “implement what you decide”. People knew what sort of Brexit they were voting for – to suggest otherwise is mere dissembling, if not patronising.

As the Vote Leave campaign made clear, the purpose of Brexit was to “take back control” of our laws and our money. This means taking Britain out of the Single Market and the customs union, not some Brexit-in-name-only compromise as outlined in Theresa May’s withdrawal agreement.

If May’s deal fails, the government should push ahead with a clean Brexit, trading under WTO rules. This would honour the referendum result and maintain the integrity of our democracy.

What would even happen after a second referendum? If there were another Leave vote, would there be a third referendum until the establishment got the “right” result? Or, if Remain won, would there have to be a decider? It would make a mockery of our democratic system, and solve absolutely nothing.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Markets & Economics
  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Business
  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Politics

Related Topics

  • Brexit
  • NHS
  • People
  • Theresa May

Trending Articles

  • Is the Zeekr 9X Super Hybrid the new luxury SUV to beat?

  • Grandparents fund university degrees to avoid inheritance tax net

  • Aldi boss wades into supermarket ‘price-gouging’ row

  • Brompton Bicycle sues former adviser for ‘professional negligence’

  • Revolut chatbot goes rogue by charging users to cancel subscription

More from Morning Wire

  • Singapore on Thames or the Sick Man of Europe?: The Economics of Brexit Ten Years from the Referendum 

    Opinion
    UK-EU Brexit negotiations meeting with officials discussing trade agreements and policy impacts in a formal conference room
  • Burnham set for crunch decision on JP Morgan’s £10bn tower

    Banking
    Breaking news update with relevant statistics and graphs displayed on a digital screen, highlighting recent data trends.
  • Will Formula 1 need to refund sponsors for cancelled Middle East races?

    Sport Business
    Max Verstappen in a Red Bull Racing cap and team shirt, looking contemplative with hands under his chin.
  • Should Burnham dash for an early election?

    Opinion
    Andy Burnham, wearing a dark suit and glasses, speaks outdoors with trees in the background.
  • Liverpool upheaval as key figure leaves after multi-club expansion fails

    Sport Business
    Stunning cityscape at dusk with skyscrapers illuminated, showcasing urban development and modern architecture.
  • World Cup boost fails to land UK services sector on front foot

    Economics
    Andy Burnham speaking at a press conference, addressing current issues, wearing a suit and tie, with a serious expression.
  • As it happened: Stocks fall as oil creeps up; Trump to ‘finish job’ in Iran

    Markets
    Donald Trump speaking at the PAAP office conference, addressing key political issues and strategies in a formal setting.
  • Easyjet extends window for another Castlelake bid

    Aviation
    EasyJet aircraft parked at the airport terminal ready for boarding, featuring distinctive orange branding and clear blue sky.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook