Skip to content
Wednesday 12 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,844.19
-0.17%
DAX
26,391.42
+0.26%
CAC 40
8,714.94
0.00%
STOXX 50
6,551.22
+0.24%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Tuesday 02 April 2019 8:06 am  |  Updated:  Monday 03 June 2019 12:42 am

DEBATE: Is John Major correct that we need a cross-party government to steer the UK through Brexit?

By: Ben Kelly and James A Smith

Add as a preferred source on Google

Is John Major correct that we need a cross-party government to steer the UK through Brexit?

YES, says Ben Kelly, a commentator for Reaction.

In the best-case scenario, a “strong and stable” government with a majority, clear priorities, and an overarching strategy would be leading the way on delivering Brexit.

Instead, we have a shambolic government on the brink of collapse, unable to pass an agreement that many in the party hate and plan to change later. Brexit may yet tear the Conservative Party apart.

The last resort may be a General Election, but with the polls currently indicating that no party can win a clear majority, even that may not alleviate the crisis.

If we are to avoid a no-deal Brexit – and there is no appetite for the revocation of Article 50 – then a government of national unity may be the only way of rising above party politics and delivering Brexit in a sustainable and economically secure way.

John Major is right. We haven’t even left the EU yet, and when we do there are many more years of negotiations and difficult decisions ahead.

Read more: Should a General Election follow the appointment of a new Prime Minister?

NO, says James A Smith, who teaches at Royal Holloway and is author of Other People's Politics: Populism to Corbynism.

If a “cross-party government” is your answer, then you have not understood the question. The meaning of the 2016 referendum result (and Trump’s victory, and Corbyn’s success in 2017) was that “ideology has returned”.

Since the early 1990s, it was assumed that all political parties agreed on the fundamentals, and that politics was a matter of finding technocratic “solutions” to isolated problems.

The result was a collapse in party membership, voter turnout, and trust in the political class. Brexit broke this pattern, and we now see very high (and polarised) political engagement.

A cross-party government would be an attempt to deal with Brexit in the old way. But Brexit is not an isolated problem and has no “quick fix”.

Tory and Labour visions of Brexit are bound up in the completely different visions that the two parties have for the country. We need a General Election to allow the parties to put Brexit in the context of these different visions.

Read more: DEBATE: Could Mike Ashley be the answer to Debenhams’ woes?

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News

Categories

  • Business
  • Politics

Related Topics

  • Brexit
  • Company
  • Debenhams
  • Mike Ashley
  • People

Trending Articles

  • Five-star Mayfair hotel hit with HMRC winding-up petition

  • Nottingham Forest owner Marinakis sues Crystal Palace for defamation

  • Back to basics: Sainsbury’s gradual retreat from the British high street

  • Hargreaves Lansdown orders staff back to office

  • As it happened: Intel, Arm shares slide; Oil climbs higher

More from Morning Wire

  • Government to inject millions into electric vehicle firms despite mandate backlash

    Politics
    Car bodies on an assembly line in a UK car plant, showcasing EV manufacturing process
  • Singapore on Thames or the Sick Man of Europe?: The Economics of Brexit Ten Years from the Referendum 

    Opinion
    UK-EU Brexit negotiations meeting with officials discussing trade agreements and policy impacts in a formal conference room
  • The Debate: should Andy Burnham have made a woman his Chancellor?

    Opinion
    Rachel Reeves delivering a speech at a press event, wearing a navy blazer and standing in front of a backdrop with logos.
  • AI powerhouses are betting on London’s future

    Opinion
    Aerial view of Kings Cross St. Pancras station and square, London, with people, buses, and surrounding buildings.
  • ‘Cost of business crisis’ as government drives up overheads by 70 per cent in a decade

    Business
    Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, drinking a pint of beer in a busy pub setting
  • On this day in 1940: Happy birthday Ken Clarke

    Opinion
    GettyImages 3261869 showcasing a significant moment in news, emphasizing key details relevant to the articles context.
  • Has Nigel Farage peaked too soon?

    Opinion
    Nigel Farage delivering a speech in July 2026, wearing a suit, addressing an audience at a political event.
  • ‘Difficult decisions’ – Burnham looks at new tax on workers to fund social care overhaul

    Politics
    Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, discussing social care with an elderly man wearing a yarmulke.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook