Skip to content
Saturday 22 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,816.56
+0.64%
DAX
26,136.56
+0.59%
CAC 40
8,484.43
+0.37%
STOXX 50
6,462.22
+0.63%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Friday 15 March 2019 8:11 am  |  Updated:  Monday 03 June 2019 12:24 am

Debate: Should the Financial Conduct Authority ban exit fees on investment platforms?

By: Alex Kovach and Alex Deane

Add as a preferred source on Google

Should the Financial Conduct Authority ban exit fees on investment platforms?

Alex Kovach, chief commercial officer at Interactive Investor, says YES.

Consumers should be able to vote with their feet and switch investment platforms without the burden of crippling exit fees. As an industry, we should not be putting up barriers to switching – and the only way to end today’s shoddy practices is to ban exit fees altogether.

It is striking that the FCA says that, overall, seven per cent of non-advised consumers who have tried to transfer from a platform have failed due to barriers in the process. Exit fees are a key part of what’s stopping the market moving.

We have not charged exit fees since 2017. We estimate that it costs just £1 per line of stock to transfer a customer out, and although moving paper is more expensive than an electronic transfer, the high exit fees seen around the industry are not economically justifiable. Good providers should be able to keep customers voluntarily, rather than through fear that they will incur huge costs if they choose to leave.

Investors should have choice, and exit fees reduce that choice.

Alex Deane, a Conservative commentator, says NO.

Subject to being competent to make decisions for oneself, an individual’s freedom to enter into financial arrangements should be as wide as possible. And choosing an arrangement with exit fees rather than one without them is a legitimate decision.

After all, let’s agree that investment platforms are going to make their money one way or another. Fees are going to be levied somewhere along the line – close one route to them, and another will be used instead.

One benefit of exit fees is apparent from the name: they’re applied when you exit, as opposed to being an upfront payment. Some investors will accept the potential of exit fees in the future, deploying that capital elsewhere in the meantime, rather than being compelled to pay immediately or along the way, as will happen if exit fees are banned.

Anyway, you’re an adult. You can make your own decisions. People, it seems, don’t think about first principles much anymore – but they should. If you don’t want an investment platform with exit fees, choose one without them.

 

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Jobs and Money
  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Business
  • Investing
  • Money
  • Opinion

Related Topics

  • FCA

Trending Articles

  • House prices in wealthy London boroughs fall by up to £300,000

  • As it happened: FTSE 100 rallies after JD Sports drags on blue chips; oil jumps again

  • Mike Ashley’s Frasers offers to pay personal shoppers in Harvey Nichols takeover

  • Ratcliffe’s Ineos saves Runcorn plant

  • Amazon says it buys books in bulk to ‘improve products’

More from Morning Wire

  • Investors risk losing life savings with unregulated services, watchdog warns

    Regulation
    The FCA has introduced new proposals to close the financial advice gap.
  • Trainline and Virgin Atlantic face watchdog’s ‘drip pricing’ probe

    Transport & Infrastructure
    A ruling by the UK ad watchdog has raised questions over Virgin Atlantic's "groundbreaking" biofuel-powered flight across the Atlantic last November.
  • Revealed: Natwest banked company used by MFS founder to ‘siphon off’ funds

    Banking
    Hand holding a NatWest debit card with a colorful design, blurred NatWest logo in the background.
  • Burnham takes on ‘rip-off’ discounts and subscriptions in cost of living push

    Politics
    Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, in a suit and glasses, looking serious against a bright sky.
  • Monzo chair makes early exit after boardroom rift

    Fintech
    The valuation would cement Monzo's status as one of Britain's biggest tech start-ups.
  • North Sea is not competitive, says BP boss days after exit

    Markets
    British Petroleum BP forecourt with fuel pumps and company signage visible in a business setting, highlighting energy serv...
  • Manchester United agree £20m a year deal with betting giant

    Sport Business
    Harry Maguire in a Manchester United jersey, clapping during a match, looking up.
  • 3 ways AI is rewriting the rules of private equity

    AD
    A person interacting with a chatbot on a smartphone, with a laptop in the background, showcasing AI and technology.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook