Skip to content
Monday 10 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,862.50
-0.35%
DAX
26,323.88
+0.02%
CAC 40
8,726.03
+0.13%
STOXX 50
6,535.62
+0.18%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Wednesday 16 January 2019 9:52 am  |  Updated:  Monday 03 June 2019 3:44 am

DEBATE: Should universities switch to only offering places based on actual rather than predicted grades?

By: Graeme Atherton and Mo Lovatt

Add as a preferred source on Google

Should universities switch to only offering places based on actual rather than predicted grades?

Dr Graeme Atherton, director of the National Education Opportunities Network and co-author of the report “Post-qualification application: a student-centred model”, says YES.

Going to university is the biggest decision that most young people face. They deserve a university admissions system that helps them make this decision properly. We are the only country in the world where university places are offered on the basis of predicted grades, and more than 80 per cent of these predictions are wrong.

A system whereby students apply on actual grades will be fairer, lessen teaching workloads, and reduce the number of students dropping out before they finish their degrees. By applying for university later, students will have more time to really think through their options, and when they know their results, they’ll be more likely to make the right choice of course for them. It will also stop some universities making unconditional no-grade offers to some students, as they currently do.

Now is the time to change this outdated system and give all students a fair chance of a university education.

Mo Lovatt, lecturer in Cultural and Creative Industries and co-chair of The Great Debate, says NO.

This proposal amounts to little more than tinkering around the edges, trying to find a technical quick-fix to making higher education “fairer”. It highlights the problem with universities today.

We’ve become obsessed with targets and grades, and instrumentalised education to the point that we’ve forgotten its core purpose: to provide students with the intellectual fuel that drives them to ask, what’s possible?

Shaking up the timetable would give universities less time to consider applications, and moving the start date back to November would leave students from disadvantaged backgrounds having to survive for longer without the Bank of Mum and Dad.

But, worse still, it reinforces the idea that grades are all-important, that the destination matters more than the journey. We need to refocus not on results but on intellectual curiosity and the joy of knowledge. This will leave students far better placed to impress in exams, in university interviews, and in their life beyond.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Jobs and Money
  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Personal Development

Related Topics

  • Higher education

Trending Articles

  • Nottingham Forest owner Marinakis sues Crystal Palace for defamation

  • Back to basics: Sainsbury’s gradual retreat from the British high street

  • Thames Water faces fresh threat to survival after pensions regulation breach

  • Hargreaves Lansdown orders staff back to office

  • As it happened: Intel, Arm shares slide; Oil climbs higher

More from Morning Wire

  • Stop peer pressuring young people into the student debt swindle

    Opinion
    UK university graduate in cap and gown holding diploma at a campus ceremony, celebrating academic achievement and success
  • The City should hire on character again

    Opinion
    Diverse group of office workers collaborating at desks with laptops and paperwork in a modern, well-lit workspace.
  • Tale of two cities: London leaps ahead in global finance but domestic growth stalls

    Economics
    Getty Images number 2154617464 depicts a relevant scene for the articles unidentified content, suitable for business context.
  • Government ‘mis-sold student loans’ to teenagers, MPs say

    Politics
    UK university graduate in cap and gown holding diploma at a campus ceremony, celebrating academic achievement and success
  • Mach42 Completes £7M Funding Round, Led by IP Group With Investment From BGF and Foresight Group

    Business Wire
  • Devolution will create losers too

    Opinion
    Andy Burnham discussing Manchesters Bee Network public transport initiative at a city council event.
  • The only answers to over-tourism are prices or queues

    Opinion
    Tourists photograph the ornate white marble Trevi Fountain in Rome, Italy.
  • Improve technical education for women to plug engineer shortage

    Opinion
    Two engineers in hard hats and high-visibility gear inspecting a large, illuminated tunnel under construction.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook