Skip to content
Saturday 12 September 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,650.44
+0.39%
DAX
25,568.56
+0.82%
CAC 40
8,179.77
+0.78%
STOXX 50
6,325.13
+0.90%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Tuesday 06 February 2018 3:50 pm

DEBATE: Should we pay more tax to increase funding for the NHS?

By: Clare Gerada and Kristian Niemietz

Add as a preferred source on Google

Should we pay more tax to increase funding for the NHS?

Dr Clare Gerada, medical director of the NHS Practitioner Health Programme and former chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs, says YES.

The NHS is our most treasured national institution. But it is clear that current funding is not keeping pace with need.

Year on year, the NHS is treating more patients, for longer, with more innovative technologies and advanced medicines than ever before. And this costs money which it doesn’t have.

There is an old adage that “you get what you pay for”, and if we want to continue our world class, cost-effective, accessible and fair service, then it will cost us and continue to cost us more – the King’s Fund estimates four per cent more a year.

It’s not realistic to rely simply on cost savings or eliminating waste – our health system already performs extremely well on measures of efficiency. If we are serious about our NHS, we have to be prepared to take tough decisions. A new tax, ring-fenced specifically for the NHS, would be a good start. This would be the best seventieth birthday present for our health service, and the best gift to us all.

Read more: Quit doublethinking and ask the tough questions about the NHS

Dr Kristian Niemietz, head of health and welfare at the Institute of Economic Affairs, says NO.

The government spends just under eight per cent of GDP on healthcare. By international standards, that is a completely mid-range figure. It is true that total healthcare spending – i.e. the sum of public/statutory spending and private/voluntary spending – is considerably higher in several of our neighbour countries. But that difference is not due to higher taxes, hypothecated or otherwise.

First, many other systems demand substantial co-payments from patients who can afford it.

Second, more market-based systems make it easier for patients to top up, or upgrade, statutory healthcare spending voluntarily. Patients can, for example, request single room accommodation in a hospital, and pay for the extra cost themselves, either out of pocket or via supplementary insurance.

If we strengthened such mechanisms, we could easily match out neighbour countries in terms of total healthcare spending without the need for additional taxes. It would probably also raise efficiency, and make the system more consumer-focused.

Read more: NHS trusts received a bailout where Carillion's shareholders lost out

 

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News

Categories

  • Business
  • Politics

Trending Articles

  • Serie A won’t catch the Premier League by selling its rights better

  • Last Night, a Star-studded Evening Celebrating Moncler’s Fifth Avenue Flagship Ushered in a New Chapter in the Brand’s Enduring Love Story With New York

  • Crystal Palace agree deal with HSBC that paves way for new training ground

  • Lotus, Porsche and Corvette: the best sports cars to buy in 2026

  • Claridge’s swings to £10m loss as luxury hotel warns on ‘adverse impact’ of tax hikes

More from Morning Wire

  • How the NHS backlog fuelled a private equity gold rush in UK health market

    Healthcare
    Private health insurance admissions continue to surge
  • NHS data counters claims that £330m Palantir deal has led to ‘no improvement’

    Tech
    Brit are seeking financial support from the ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ to afford private healthcare.
  • The real divide in British politics: fantasists vs realists

    Opinion
    Houses of Parliament in Westminster showcasing historic architecture under a clear sky, central to UK government and politics
  • Leeds NHS Innovation to Accelerate Global Adoption of AI-enabled Pathology for Cancer Diagnostics Through Epredia Partnership

    Business Wire
  • ‘Social value’ procurement rules are an absurd waste of time and money

    Economics
    Tunnelling for the Euston link finally kicks off this week.
  • Burnham calls for honesty then sticks his head in the sand

    Politics
    Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, in a dark suit holding a red folder outside 10 Downing Street
  • Stop arguing about who pays for care and figure out why it costs so much

    Opinion
    Andy Burnham speaks at Golders Green care home visit, September 2026, engaging with attendees.
  • Sorry Elon, universal basic income won’t solve the AI jobs apocalypse

    Opinion
    Elon Musk smiling and waving from a podium with the Seal of the President of the United States.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook