Skip to content
Tuesday 11 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,844.19
-0.17%
DAX
26,391.42
+0.26%
CAC 40
8,714.94
-0.13%
STOXX 50
6,551.22
+0.24%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Thursday 29 November 2018 9:09 am  |  Updated:  Monday 03 June 2019 3:12 am

DEBATE: Is there any point in having a televised debate over Theresa May’s Brexit deal?

By: Mo Lovatt and Alex Deane

Add as a preferred source on Google

Is there any point in having a televised debate over Theresa May’s Brexit deal?

Mo Lovatt, lecturer in Cultural and Creative Industries and co-chair of The Great Debate, says YES.

The message coming out of the Prime Minister’s office this week is that “people are bored with Brexit”, so it’s time to #BackTheBrexitDeal.

The strategy is a cynical attempt by Number 10 to reach over the heads of divided parliamentarians, in a direct appeal to the electorate, because people – it is calculated – are so fed-up that they’ll accept the deal.

But Theresa May has misjudged the public mood. If there is one thing that people are still passionate about, it’s Brexit. We’ve spent hours in pubs, lecture halls, on social media, arguing our case. We’ve fallen out with friends, colleagues, and family members. In my lifetime, nothing has impassioned the electorate more.

So, May must face the electorate in a televised debate. Putting her case to the people is absolutely the right decision. The question is, will she listen to their response? We could prove a more formidable opponent than this tin-eared Prime Minister bargained for.

Alex Deane, a Conservative commentator, says NO.

Think about it. The side debating against Theresa May’s deal (presumably headlined by Jeremy Corbyn) would be able to pepper their argument with criticism from each of the opposing perspectives: ranging from continuity remoaning to headbanging that this is not Brexit enough. Like primal screaming or public emesis, it might feel good to the person doing it, but it yields little by way of enlightenment.

Contrariwise, whoever takes the Prime Minister’s position (presumably Amber Rudd, if last time was anything to go by) will Geoffrey Boycott the whole thing out, making the arguments we have heard already.

A real debate would be between the sovereign perspective that sees Britain leaving the bloc, and the increasingly integrationist EU views of Donald Tusk and co. That would provide some genuinely helpful insight into the nature of the club we are leaving. But we’re not going to get it. I was an enthusiastic student debater and enjoy public discourse, but I fail to see what we gain from a debate on the Brexit deal.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Politics

Related Topics

  • Brexit
  • Donald Tusk
  • Jeremy Corbyn
  • People
  • Theresa May

Trending Articles

  • Five-star Mayfair hotel hit with HMRC winding-up petition

  • Nottingham Forest owner Marinakis sues Crystal Palace for defamation

  • Back to basics: Sainsbury’s gradual retreat from the British high street

  • Hargreaves Lansdown orders staff back to office

  • As it happened: Intel, Arm shares slide; Oil climbs higher

More from Morning Wire

  • Reform’s Richard Tice under parliamentary investigation

    Politics
    Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and Deputy Leader Richard Tice are set to meet with Andrew Bailey to discuss interest rates and stablecoins.
  • Singapore on Thames or the Sick Man of Europe?: The Economics of Brexit Ten Years from the Referendum 

    Opinion
    UK-EU Brexit negotiations meeting with officials discussing trade agreements and policy impacts in a formal conference room
  • Finally, a regulator is ahead of the curve on AI

    Opinion
    FCA reception area highlighting UKs shift to market-led innovation post-Brexit in financial regulations debate
  • The Debate: Should Britain set up a No 10 North?

    Opinion
    Andy Burnham supporters rallying with banners and signs at a political event, showcasing enthusiasm and solidarity
  • The Debate: should Andy Burnham have made a woman his Chancellor?

    Opinion
    Rachel Reeves delivering a speech at a press event, wearing a navy blazer and standing in front of a backdrop with logos.
  • The debate: should voting be compulsory?

    Opinion
    Ipsos Mori is one of the largest polling companies operating in the UK.
  • The Debate: Should political donations be capped at £100,000?

    Opinion
    Nigel Farage delivering a speech in July 2026, wearing a suit, addressing an audience at a political event.
  • Can the City make friends with Healey?

    Politics
    Chancellor John Healey smiling, wearing a navy suit, white shirt, and red tie.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook