Skip to content
Friday 7 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,901.09
+0.31%
DAX
26,319.45
+0.69%
CAC 40
8,714.93
+0.17%
STOXX 50
6,523.86
+0.33%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Wednesday 11 March 2026 10:41 am  |  Updated:  Wednesday 11 March 2026 10:51 am

How universities became a marketplace for academic slop

By: Paul Ormerod

Add as a preferred source on Google
Modern university library with students studying, bookshelves filled with academic resources, and natural light streaming ...

Pressure to publish papers mean universities have become awash with fake papers, scientific fraud and academic slop, writes Paul Ormerod

For universities, it seems that it never rains but it pours. The media is currently full of stories of the woes of graduates and their seemingly ever-rising, never-repaid loans.

But concerns are growing about what many may see as the core function of a university, at least the intellectually stronger ones: namely, the research which they publish.

Academics publish their work in specialist journals, which in principle only accept papers once they have been read by other academics – the so-called peer review process – and deemed to be of a sufficient standard to merit appearing in print.

There has been a massive increase over the past decade in both the number of journals which exist and in the volume of papers which are published.

Even in 2016, it is estimated that, worldwide across all disciplines, 1.9m academic articles were published each year. Now, the figure stands at over 5m and is rising.

Fake papers and academic slop

Unless your field of expertise is very narrowly defined – Hittite grammar, say – it is simply not possible to read every piece which comes out which might be relevant to your own work, and in some areas not even a fraction.

Fortunately, most of this work is of no value, so it does not matter if it is read or not. The benchmark which academics themselves use to judge the value of a paper is whether it is cited by other researchers in their own publications. In most disciplines, well over half of all the papers published have zero citations.

This is a tremendous waste of effort. It is almost like the Soviet factory meeting its Five Year Plan quota by making only right-footed shoes. Huge numbers are made, but they are not worth anything.

Read more

I’m an editor. This is the most worrying thing about AI slop

Young woman drawing or writing at a desk, surrounded by art supplies, illustrating human creativity vs AI.

But academics are acting rationally as individuals in carrying out this work. They are under tremendous pressure to publish papers. Promotion, or even the continued existence of their job, depend to a substantial extent on this.  

Worryingly, evidence is emerging of the system being gamed on a rapidly rising scale. Indeed what is happening is far worse than that. The number of papers which are purely faked is rising much faster than the number of genuine ones.

Universities have become a marketplace

Luis Amaral, based at Northwestern University in America, is one of the world’s top specialists in the analysis of networks. He and his team have just published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science which identifies, using advanced maths, major concerns.

Faked papers are being generated by what is known as paper mills. Citations in journals of these are being systematically manipulated. Scientific fraud extends beyond the production of fake papers to brokerage roles in a widespread network of editors and authors who cooperate to achieve the publication of scientific papers that escape traditional peer-review standards.

Amaral and his colleagues identify organisations selling what they describe as “contract cheating services”, which for example pay journal editors to accept papers and anticipate defensive steps which may be taken by respectable journals to identify bogus results.

They conclude by noting the dangers posed by large scale fraudulent science given the rise in the use of large language models to encapsulate scientific knowledge. Such models cannot yet distinguish high quality science from either poor quality or fake science.

To economists, none of this will be surprising. A market has emerged. Universities have created performance metrics focused on the number of papers published and the number of times they are cited. Incentives therefore exist to game the system and people are responding to them, to the extent that Amaral argues that in some fields the scientific literature is already “irreparably damaged”.

Both universities and public grant giving bodies in research need to urgently review these metrics before the problem gets completely out of control.

Paul Ormerod is an honorary professor at the Alliance Business School at the University of Manchester.  You can follow him on Instagram @profpaulormerod

Read more

In Jason Arday, Cambridge is discovering the dangers of DEI

Jason Arday smiling, wearing academic regalia with a blue cap and gown with red accents.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Opinion
  • News

Categories

  • Opinion
  • Business

People & Organisations

  • academia
  • academic research
  • science
  • Students
  • uk universities
  • universities

Trending Articles

  • Revolut founder’s wealth set to balloon amid talks of share award at $500bn valuation

  • Rupert Lowe axes pensions triple lock and pledges tax cuts in economic plan

  • WPP slashes jobs as revenue continues to fall

  • Liverpool owners tipped to sell – but not to Amazon boss Bezos – by former CEO

  • As it happened: Stocks rise as oil fluctuates after Red Sea attack; US-Iran deal ‘being circulated’

More from Morning Wire

  • I’m an editor. This is the most worrying thing about AI slop

    Life&Style
    Young woman drawing or writing at a desk, surrounded by art supplies, illustrating human creativity vs AI.
  • In Jason Arday, Cambridge is discovering the dangers of DEI

    Opinion
    Jason Arday smiling, wearing academic regalia with a blue cap and gown with red accents.
  • The best weapon against AI slop is a good lunch

    Opinion
    Pub in Leadenhall Market, London
  • Mach42 Completes £7M Funding Round, Led by IP Group With Investment From BGF and Foresight Group

    Business Wire
  • Britain has an AI minister – now it needs an AI answer

    Opinion
    Kanishka Narayan, prominent figure in the news, engaging in a public event or discussion, showcasing leadership and influe...
  • There’s a 45 per cent chance this op-ed was written by AI

    Opinion
    Vintage 1960s typing gloves, showcasing retro office fashion and ergonomic design for typewriter use
  • Student housing giant Unite faces £400m loss amid property value slump

    Property
    Unite Students building with brick facade and blue windows, city skyline in background under blue sky
  • Stop peer pressuring young people into the student debt swindle

    Opinion
    UK university graduate in cap and gown holding diploma at a campus ceremony, celebrating academic achievement and success
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook