Skip to content
Monday 14 September 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,650.44
+0.39%
DAX
25,568.56
0.00%
CAC 40
8,179.77
0.00%
STOXX 50
6,325.13
0.00%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Wednesday 10 August 2016 7:15 pm

Is the IFS right to warn that Britain will be up to £70bn worse off if it leaves the Single Market?

By: John Redwood and Denis MacShane

Add as a preferred source on Google

Denis MacShane, former Europe minister, author of Brexit: How Britain Will Leave Europe and senior adviser at Avisa Partners, Brussels, says Yes.

For centuries, the main purpose of British foreign policy was to gain access for British goods, services, and professions to other markets in the world. Britain currently has unfettered access to 500m mainly middle class consumers in the EU Single Market. It was Margaret Thatcher who forced through the Single European Act which broke down national barriers to British goods, services, and people so that they could be sold or ply for hire in 27 other countries without let or hindrance. Now, the respected and non-partisan Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says that outside the Single Market we lose 4 per cent of GDP – about £2,900 for every household. India still places a tariff of 150 per cent on every bottle of Scotch sold and the US Buy America legislation is highly protectionist. Leaving the Single Market is economic self-harm. A psycho-therapist might be able to explain it, but it cannot make sense to anyone in business.

John Redwood MP, chief global strategist at Charles Stanley, says No.

Staying a member of the Single Market is likely to entail continuing to make some financial contributions to the EU and accepting freedom of movement. Brexit to those who voted Out means taking back control of UK money, borders, taxes and laws. The IFS claims that we will be 4 per cent better off remaining in the Single Market. To get to such a loss, you need to be very pessimistic about trade between the UK and the rest of the EU on leaving. There is every chance, for example, that the UK will keep financial passporting. Why would the EU wish to make access to London more difficult? Why wouldn’t the UK qualify for passports under the MIFID equivalence of regulation rules? There is also the issue of tariffs. The UK may wish to continue with tariff-free trade. Will EU member states agree on specific tariffs they wish to impose on profitable trade with the UK, that are permissible under WTO rules? Do they want the UK to have to retaliate? It is not possible to predict the outcome before any exit and trade negotiations. It is not sensible to put a number on such uncertainty.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Opinion

Categories

  • Opinion

Trending Articles

  • Wetherspoon boss: ‘Not up to Burnham’ to choose who is on the high street 

  • Four interest rate hikes loom despite surprise economic growth

  • Reform hits back at Tory plan to ‘abolish inheritance tax’

  • Lotus, Porsche and Corvette: the best sports cars to buy in 2026

  • Primark sales slip as owner dresses up retailer for demerger

More from Morning Wire

  • Britain has an AI minister – now it needs an AI answer

    Opinion
    Kanishka Narayan, prominent figure in the news, engaging in a public event or discussion, showcasing leadership and influe...
  • Burnham has inherited Labour’s EU delusion

    Opinion
    Emmanuel Macron, Brigitte Macron, and UK officials outside 10 Downing Street
  • Callum Anderson MP: the Labour case for financial services

    Opinion
    Callum Anderson, a smiling man in a navy suit and patterned tie, against a dark gray background.
  • Why middle eastern capital is becoming part of London’s fintech story

    Partner
    Canary Wharf skyline at dusk with illuminated skyscrapers reflecting in the dark water of the River Thames.
  • The Bayeux Tapestry, British Museum review: believe the hype

    Life&Style
    Detailed section of the Bayeux Tapestry showing soldiers, horses, ships, and daily life scenes.
  • Energy price cap rises to three-year high

    Energy
    Smartphone displaying an energy bill, with British pounds and coins beside it, symbolizing rising costs.
  • SpaceX float ‘could kickstart mega IPO access for British retail investors’

    Markets
    Skyline of Canada with iconic financial district buildings, highlighting UK investments and economic growth.
  • Britain’s problem isn’t too much Thatcherism, but too little

    Opinion
    Margaret Thatcher smiling outside 10 Downing Street during her tenure as UKs longest-serving Prime Minister in the 20th ce...
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook