Skip to content
Friday 28 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,814.36
+0.20%
DAX
26,514.54
+0.56%
CAC 40
8,403.14
+1.00%
STOXX 50
6,475.41
+0.79%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Thursday 14 January 2010 7:18 pm  |  Updated:  Saturday 01 June 2019 1:58 pm

Know the perils of poaching

By: KCS-content

Add as a preferred source on Google

ANYBODY working in a client-facing business and thinking of starting their own firm has to be aware of the legal tangle surrounding “poaching” your former clients.

What is allowed all hinges on the contract you signed with your former employer. If you have a contract with “restrictive covenants” then you need to tread carefully. A restrictive covenant, in essence, protects the employer’s client base if an employee leaves the firm and sets up a business in competition to it.

There are two forms of restrictive covenant that can be included in a contract. The first is a legal obligation not to solicit your former employer’s clients for deals or business, the second restricts you from doing business with a former client even if they approach you.

These covenants usually last for a period of six to twelve months, says Matthew Whelan, an employment lawyer with law firm Speechly Bircham. He also says that if they are ignored they can destroy a start-up: “You need to check your contract otherwise a viable business plan, but one that depends on business from your old clients may no longer be viable,” he says.

Breaking your contract can also be costly, as your former employer has the right to take you to court. If found guilty the consequences include damages paid to the employer for loss of business; an injunction against you that means you must immediately stop doing any further business in breach of these covenants; and paying your former employer’s legal fees.

“People shouldn’t be quick to ignore the restrictive covenants in their contracts,” says Martin Brewer a partner at law firm Mills & Reeve. However, the law has been designed so that it is not overly prohibitive for people to leave a firm and break out on their own.

Martin Brewer points out that covenants written into contracts can be “adequate but not more than adequate.” For example: If you work for a large hedge fund and you only manage 20 per cent of the firm’s client base, then the covenants only apply to the clients that you worked with, leaving you free to do business with the other 80 per cent.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Jobs and Money

Categories

  • Money

Related Topics

  • NULL

Trending Articles

  • Pensioners to hand over bank statements in government benefits crackdown

  • Jamie Carragher: HMRC petitions for Sky Sports star to be declared bankrupt

  • Brewdog founder James Watt hits out at ‘total silence’ over new venture

  • Lloyds Bank and Halifax users unable to use app in latest outage

  • Economists urge Bank of England to halt bond sales as borrowing costs climb

More from Morning Wire

  • Multiplier Raises $35 Million Series B to Build a New Model for Professional Services

    Business Wire
  • KPMG seeks financial support from parent group in wake of audit scandal

    Big Four
    KPMG Australia office building exterior with modern glass architecture and corporate signage in a bustling business district.
  • Meet the top lawyer challenging Gianni Infantino’s Fifa power play

    Law
    Gianni Infantino, FIFA President, waves to a crowd with a blue and gold patterned background
  • City law firm sues prominent Emirati business family

    Lawsuit
    Due to the provided information being incomplete, I am unable to generate specific alt text for the image in question. Ple...
  • Former Crystal Palace owner John Textor scores temporary block of Brazilian football club share sale

    Lawsuit
    John Textor says he is ready to sell his stake in Crystal Palace to avoid the club being kicked out of the Europa League due to rules on multi-club ownership.
  • Interpath chief fined for breaching confidentiality rules before KPMG spin-off

    Prof Services
    Canada skyline representing the potential legal impact of Labours flexible working reforms on businesses
  • KBRA Assigns Rating to Petit Forestier Group’s $510 million and €100 million Senior Unsecured Notes

    Business Wire
  • Everfox Reaffirms Commitment to UK Armed Forces Covenant

    Business Wire
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook