Skip to content
Sunday 30 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,824.26
+0.29%
DAX
26,569.99
+0.77%
CAC 40
8,401.18
+0.98%
STOXX 50
6,485.67
+0.95%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Sunday 20 May 2012 11:05 pm  |  Updated:  Thursday 30 May 2019 5:54 am

At last – this Tax Commission has a practical way to fix the UK system

By: KCS-content

Add as a preferred source on Google

THE 2020 Tax Commission, and its final report out today, isn’t the first call for substantial reforms to create a more efficient tax system. We found 53 earlier reviews. But taxes are still dysfunctional, and the last substantial change for the better was Nigel Lawson’s 1988 Budget and its sharp cuts in marginal tax rates. So why has all that intellectual work failed to translate into better policy?

The reviews address a real problem. We have a tax code that is 11,520 pages long. No one really knows how much they are paying, and everyone suspects that everyone else isn’t paying their fair share. As our tax system loses legitimacy, we edge closer to the situation already seen in countries such as Greece. .

If you look at the numbers honestly, including employees’ and employers’ National Insurance contributions, marginal tax rates start at 40 per cent on low earners; rise to nearly 50 per cent for those paying at the higher rate from about £40,000; nearly 70 per cent for those earning £100,000 to £120,000 with their personal allowance withdrawn; fall back to 50 per cent; then rise to nearly 60 per cent for the additional rate from £150,000. Capital income gets taxed repeatedly by corporation tax, taxes on dividends and capital gains tax, among others.

Decades of economic research show that high marginal tax rates depress labour supply, investment and innovation. High taxes put people off working and investing in Britain. That means less growth and less of the growth in productivity that is critical to ease the enormous pressure currently being placed on living standards.

So if the need for tax reform is that pressing, why haven’t all those worthy reports made more progress?

Too often they make compromises with the bureaucracy, and its attachment to the status quo, and not with the public, who are worried they’ll end up paying more of the taxes they hate than they do now. Many reform proposals include new or higher taxes on property. There’s a reason that the UK – which raises more in property taxes than any other developed economy– only gets 4.2 per cent of GDP from them. People hate council tax like no other tax. In the US, property taxes cause more taxpayer rebellions than any other category.

There are two reasons. First, those taxes tend to be taken as a lump sum, instead of deducted from wages. Second, they aren’t attached to a stream of income that can be used to pay the tax. Someone can have a property but not enough income to pay an annual tax. Forcing people out of their homes is ugly. Even if they can pay, most are loss averse. Unless they spend their days in front of a trading terminal, they find it more unpleasant to lose £10 than to gain £90 instead of £100.

Other proposals are based on a big expansion in the VAT base, applying it to food, for example. It’s not hard to see why adding a fifth to the price of food is a non-starter. Even small moves in that direction in the Budget ended in headlines about caravan and pasty taxes. And as cutting income tax doesn’t do anything for the poorest, higher VAT results in higher poverty or a rise in benefit dependency.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance and the Institute of Directors think that this tax commission will be different. The 2020 Tax Commission – which was chaired by Morning Wire’s editor Allister Heath – demands more from the politicians and bureaucrats who would have to enact it. Merging income tax with both employees’ and employers’ National Insurance for a single tax on labour income. Merging the different taxes on capital, so you can have the same rate on labour and capital income – 30 per cent – but also one of the most competitive tax systems in the world. Cutting spending and the overall burden of tax, so that people are left with more money in their pockets. They’ll spend it better than government.

In return, it gives the public the tax system they want: a clear understanding that everyone always pays the same rate on the same income and, if they earn twice as much, they pay twice as much. And it gives them the tax cut they want and deserve.

Matthew Sinclair is director of the TaxPayers’ Alliance. The report is available at www.2020tax.org

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Opinion

Categories

  • Opinion

Related Topics

  • NULL

Trending Articles

  • Pensioners to hand over bank statements in government benefits crackdown

  • Jamie Carragher: HMRC petitions for Sky Sports star to be declared bankrupt

  • Jamie Vardy bags Bundesliga rights as he steps up streaming war with Neville and Lineker

  • City firms mandate phone and face-to-face comms bootcamps for Gen Z lawyers

  • Brewdog founder James Watt hits out at ‘total silence’ over new venture

More from Morning Wire

  • An overly complicated tax system is holding the UK back

    Opinion
    Inheritance tax receipts are on track for a record breaking year
  • John Caudwell and Stuart Rose blast ‘tax creep’ 

    Economics
    John Caudwell in a formal setting, possibly during a business meeting or public speaking event, conveying professionalism.
  • Vibes matter with tax, so here’s how Healey can deliver a feel-good Budget

    Opinion
    Chancellor John Healey smiling, wearing a navy suit, white shirt, and red tie.
  • State pension set to pile pain on next generation of taxpayers, Healey warned

    Politics
    Andy Burnham and Angela Rayner interacting with children at an outdoor event
  • Budget 2026: Which taxes will Burnham and Healey hike?

    Tax
    Andy Burnham, John Healey, and Louise Haigh by a doorway, discussing tax policy for a news article.
  • Grandparents fund university degrees to avoid inheritance tax net

    Personal Finance
    GettyImages 452181854 showing a business conference with diverse professionals engaged in a panel discussion.
  • Healey told tax rises for fiscal remedy are ‘not required’

    Economics
    Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, smiling and gesturing, speaks at a podium.
  • ‘War on wealth creation’: capital gains tax raid would lose government money, Tories argue

    Politics
    Mel Stride speaking at a press conference, addressing key issues, in a formal setting with a backdrop of the events logo.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook