Met Police chief’s future in the balance as political row grows over ‘openly Jewish’ incident
Sir Mark Rowley’s future as head of the Met Police hangs in the balance following calls for him to resign over his handling of the pro-Palestine protests in the capital.
The calls for Rowley to quit came after Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA) chief executive Gideon Falter was threatened with arrest near a pro-Palestine protest on April 13, with one police officer describing him as “openly Jewish”.
Another officer told Falter he would be arrested if he didn’t leave the area as his presence was “antagonising” and he was “causing a breach of peace with all these other people”.
Both the CAA and former home secretary Suella Braverman have called for the police chief to resign or be sacked, accusing him of having “emboldened” antisemites.
But energy security secretary Claire Coutinho declined to join the calls, and told the BBC: “I personally wouldn’t go that far because I haven’t had the conversations with him.”
Earlier, she told Sky News Rowley’s future is a matter for London mayor Sadiq Khan “who has the responsibility to hold the Met to account”.
Khan does have the power to effectively sack the commissioner, but can only do so with the permission of the home secretary, who can also require the Mayor to dismiss the Met chief.
Labour’s shadow justice secretary Shabana Mahmood also said she did not think getting rid of Sir Mark is “the way forward”.
She told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: “I think the police should take all steps to maintain community confidence from all communities in the way that they go about their business on the streets of London and elsewhere.”
A spokesman for Khan said the Met’s handling of the incident was “concerning” and that the force “must have the confidence of the communities they serve”.
Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA) chief executive Gideon Falter said: “What the Met under Sir Mark has done to the Jewish community over the course of six months is utterly unforgivable and it is time for him to go. Enough is enough.”
Braverman used an opinion piece in the Sunday Telegraph to demand his resignation, saying people who are “flagrantly antisemitic” are being “waved on by the police”.
She said: “Either this is gross incompetence, or it’s a culture coming from the top, where thugs are free to intimidate and harass while the rest of us have to keep our mouths shut.”
Other figures, including deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden, have been highly critical of the Met but stopped short of saying Rowley should go.
Policing minister Chris Philp said he will meet him to discuss the matter, and the Board of Deputies of British Jews has written to Rowley asking for an “urgent meeting to reinforce the gravity of the situation” and start repairing a “grievous loss of confidence” in the Met.
Home Secretary James Cleverly has also written to the force and Khan about the incident.
Rowley said: “Every member of the Met is determined to ensure that London is a city in which everyone feels safe. We absolutely understand how vulnerable Jewish and Muslim Londoners feel since the terrorist attacks on Israel.
“Some of our actions have increased this concern. I personally reiterate our apology from earlier this week. Today, as with every other day, our officers will continue to police with courage, empathy and impartiality.”
The Met apologised on Friday for the incident involving Mr Falter, suggesting opponents of pro-Palestinian marches “must know that their presence is provocative” and they are “increasing the likelihood of an altercation” by lining the route to object.
But the force subsequently issued another statement apologising for the “further offence” caused by its first apology.
A Home Office spokesman said: “We welcome the Met Police’s apology, and recognise the complexities of policing fast-moving public protests, but simply being Jewish – or of any other race or religion – should never be seen as provocative.
“Anyone of any religion should be free to go about their lives and feel safe doing so.”