Skip to content
Friday 21 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,771.14
+0.21%
DAX
26,062.77
+0.31%
CAC 40
8,468.34
+0.18%
STOXX 50
6,448.19
+0.41%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Friday 12 July 2024 5:52 am  |  Updated:  Thursday 11 July 2024 4:33 pm

Non-doms are paying record taxes, but Labour will shove them out the door

By: David Lesperance

Add as a preferred source on Google

The wealthiest non-doms are packing their bags and taking their outsize contributions to the exchequer with them, and that’s just the start of the exodus of the wealthy that will occur if Labour implements its plans, says David Lesperance

“London is nice… but it’s not that nice!” These were the words of one of my clients when presented with his future tax obligations if the new Labour government implements its proposals on non-doms.

I’ve advised wealthy international families both in-bound and out-bound to the UK for over three decades. From this position, I am able to confirm first-hand that ultra high net worth (UHNW) non-doms are getting and executing departure plans. 

Whether or not one agrees with Labour’s spending priorities, achieving those goals requires money – specifically tax revenue. Non-doms paid £8.9bn in tax in 2023, the highest level since 2017. Currently there were 37,000 non-doms in 2020-2021 who contributed an average of £170,000 each. Also as recently revealed just 100,000 taxpayers – who represent just 0.3 per cent of all UK taxpayers – pay a quarter of all income tax and CGT. Given the significant loss of tax revenue caused by the departure of any super contributing taxpayer, it is critical to properly explore the question: Will they leave?

To do this, it is worth first understanding that all UK taxpayers have a certain amount of “life inertia” in the UK. According to Newtonian principles, they will only depart if the force of additional taxation is greater than that inertia. To answer the departure question, let’s first look at non-doms, as they are the ones who will be immediately impacted by a new Labour government.

There are really two different types of non-doms. The first group are foreigners who work in the City. They pay normal tax on their UK income and opt to pay a remittance to protect the income and capital gains earned by assets they had before moving to the UK. They have a significant amount of life inertia as they have to remain in London to generate their current compensation and the loss of the remittance basis will not really increase their UK tax bill. These tend to be affluent – that is millionaires, rather than super rich – who can easily deal with inheritance tax through insurance etc. As a result, members of this group will be less likely to leave the UK.

The second group are UHNW foreigners (think Times Rich List). They do not need to remain in London to make or maintain their wealth. The previous government’s decision to abolish the remittance regime wasn’t quite enough to cause them to leave. This is because they can arrange their affairs to have minimal income. Furthermore, rather than trigger capital gains by selling assets they can borrow against them to cover living expenses. However, with Labour’s announcement regarding protected and excluded property trusts, exposure of worldwide assets to 40 per cent inheritance tax is a major shove out the door for the richest non-doms. As a result, this group is highly likely to leave the UK.

To understand the impact of their departure, it is worth noting that not only will the predicted windfall from cancellation of the remittance basis not occur, but there will be a significant drop in annual tax collections. This is a direct result of the fact that UHNW non-doms oversized contributions will no longer be there to drive that average up to its current previously noted level. A perfect illustration is Akshata Murty, who contributed £4.4m in UK tax in the year before she opted out of the remittance basis.

So the bottom-line is that UHNW non-doms are definitely looking for the exits. 

What is even more ominous for UK residents is that I am now dealing with UK doms who are also exploring their departure options. They can see the writing on the wall that when Labour finds an unexpected lack of cookies in the non-dom cookie jar they will be the next target. Recent rumours about future capital gains tax increases, exit tax, increased inheritance tax and a wealth tax is just fuelling their anxiety. 

Some, believing the myth that the wealthy don’t pay UK tax, will say “don’t let the door hit you on the way out”. To them, I can only cite Volaire: ”It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.”

David Lesperance is managing director of Lesperance & Associates. He is one of the world’s leading international tax and immigration advisors. He co-authored, with LSE Professor Emeritus Ian Angell, Flight of the Golden Geese: How the 1% Matter to the 99%

Read more

Vibes matter with tax, so here’s how Healey can deliver a feel-good Budget

Chancellor John Healey smiling, wearing a navy suit, white shirt, and red tie.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Opinion

Categories

  • Opinion

People & Organisations

  • CGT
  • IHT
  • Labour
  • non-domiciled
  • non-doms
  • Rachel Reeves

Related Topics

  • Non-doms
  • Rachel Reeves
  • Tax

Trending Articles

  • House prices in wealthy London boroughs fall by up to £300,000

  • As it happened: Miners fuel FTSE 100 recovery; oil jumps as Trump claims Strait of Hormuz

  • City law firm sues prominent Emirati business family

  • Amanda Blanc has worked her magic at Aviva

  • As it happened: FTSE 100 rallies after JD Sports drags on blue chips; oil jumps again

More from Morning Wire

  • Hammersmith Bridge is a test for Burnham’s place-based growth

    Opinion
    Hammersmith Bridge closed in 2021 with fencing, banners, and traffic cones blocking access to the walkway.
  • The decline of Harvey Nichols is a tale of London’s decline too

    Opinion
    Harvey Nichols department store at night, illuminated with neon signs and colorful window displays.
  • Are cars really the problem? London cyclists, it’s time to look within our ranks

    Opinion
    London cyclists ride Lime bikes and personal bicycles on a city street, promoting urban mobility and eco-friendly transport.
  • Which is the smelliest Tube line?

    Opinion
    Passenger wearing a blue surgical mask and coat on a London Underground train.
  • Take it from an AI founder, London is where it’s at

    Opinion
    London skyline with The Shard, Walkie Talkie, and Gherkin skyscrapers towering over residential buildings and autumn trees.
  • I drove 3,000 miles and saw the America AI is leaving behind

    Opinion
    Rusty MOTEL sign, classic cars, and Route 66 Kix on 66 sign in Tucumcari, NM for a US road trip
  • IPO tweaks are welcome, but London’s market needs root and branch reform

    Opinion
    Busy London Stock Exchange trading floor in the 1980s with brokers at hexagonal trading posts.
  • I built my career on social media as a teen. I still think banning under-16s is right

    Opinion
    Smartphone screen displaying a folder of social media app icons including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and YouTube.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook