Reeves’ spending review ‘natural point’ to boost defence -IFS
The Chancellor’s upcoming spending review provides a “natural point” to put the UK on the path to further boost defence spending, an economic think tank has said.
Defence and NHS spending will dominate the review, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said in an analysis.
It said Rachel Reeves will face “unavoidably” tough choices on 11 June, when she announces the Government’s day-to-day departmental budgets for the next three years and investment budgets for the next four.
One of the central trade-offs will be how much funding goes to the NHS, as increasing it at anything like the historical average rate would mean real-terms cuts for other “unprotected” departments, the IFS said.
In the spending review, Reeves will confirm the path for defence spending.
“This would be a natural point for the government to put the UK on a path towards spending three per cent of GDP on defence, or to speed up the timeline at which the UK will reach 2.5 per cent, if it views this as necessary,” the think tank said.
The government has previously set out its “ambition” to reach three per cent in the next parliament, after meeting its pledge to ratchet up defence spending to 2.5 per cent by April 2027.
Defence secretary John Healey has said getting to three per cent by 2034 is a firm commitment, telling The Times there was “no doubt” Britain would be spending three per cent “in the next parliament”.
IFS research economist Bee Boileau said funding elsewhere will likely slow to a “trickle” at the spending review.
She said: “At the spending review the government faces some unavoidably tough choices, particularly as, after turning on the spending taps last autumn, the flow of additional funding is now set to slow to more of a trickle.
“Take capital spending: Government investment is set to be sustained at historically high levels in the coming years, but most of the increase happened last year and this year, and it looks as if all of the remaining increase in funding over this parliament has already been allocated to defence.
“Simultaneously prioritising additional investments in public services, net zero and growth-friendly areas within this envelope will be impossible.”
The Local Government Association said that councils need a “significant and sustained” boost to funding to deliver services.
“Councils in England face a funding gap of up to £8bn by 2028/29 and have already had to make huge savings and efficiencies over the past decade,” LGA chairman Pete Marland said.
“They desperately need a significant and sustained increase in overall funding in the spending review to meet the requirements being placed on them.
“Without adequate funding, councils will continue to struggle to provide crucial services, with devastating consequences for those who rely on them, and it will be impossible for them to help the Government achieve its reform and growth agenda.”
The Liberal Democrats urged the government to put money into social care.
“Ending the crisis in our NHS must be a top priority, but unless they fix social care too, ministers will just be bailing water from a sinking boat with a spoon,” the party’s Treasury spokeswoman, Daisy Cooper, said.
“Vital NHS investment risks going to waste if hospitals can’t discharge patients who don’t need to be there and if local authorities don’t have the resources to care for people in their homes and prevent them going to hospital in the first place.”
She also urged the government to urgently negotiate a bespoke UK-EU customs union, to boost the economy, before looking at “painful cuts to already stretched budgets”, from justice to farming.
A government spokesperson said: “The plan for change is delivering what matters for working people – cutting hospital waiting lists, getting control of our borders and tackling the cost of living.
“This spending review will scrutinise every single pound the government spends to ensure it’s delivering on our plan for change.”
By Helen Corbett, PA Political Correspondent