Skip to content
Wednesday 19 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,728.04
+0.07%
DAX
26,128.36
-0.80%
CAC 40
8,509.36
0.00%
STOXX 50
6,468.17
-0.95%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Thursday 28 September 2023 3:10 pm

Trade law for blockchain – the most important law you’ve never heard of

By: Crypto AM: Industry Voices

Add as a preferred source on Google
Elise Soucie, Director of Policy & Regulation, GBBC Digital Finance 
Elise Soucie, GBBC Digital Finance 

by Elise Soucie, Director of Policy & Regulation, GBBC Digital Finance 

Barely a week ago, the Electronic Trade Documents Act came into force in the UK. It slipped the attention of many blockchain and distributed ledger technology (DLT) enthusiasts because it doesn’t once mention blockchain, or any other technology, but what it does say is much more important. 

The Act propels UK law from the typewriter era, (the original statute was put into place in 1882) into the modern age. By legally granting electronic trade documents the ability to be treated like paper if they can act like paper, the law aims to drive international trading to be more efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost effective. 

So, what does it mean to ‘act’ like paper? To do so, the electronic trade document must:

  • be identifiable so that it can be distinguishable from any copies
  • retain its integrity (not be alterable without necessary authority)
  • not allow more than one person to exercise control over it at any one time
  • be capable of being uniquely linked to that person and
  • be fully divested on transfer.

These criteria were carefully set out in order to capture the complexity of trade documents which legally are ‘possessive’. Another way to think about this is that they are tangible ‘things’ which you can have possession of.

Like dematerialised securities instead of stock certificates, an electronic trade document can’t just be a digital file in name alone. Even though it is not something that can be physically grasped, it legally needs to meet the same standards to be tangibly possessed and legally recognised in electronic financial bookkeeping. 

Using DLT, of which blockchain is one of many forms, is a very viable way to meet these criteria. As DLT is a consensus of replicated, shared, and synchronized digital data that may be spread across multiple sites, countries, or institutions, it enables the secure validation, recording and sharing of data.

Its inherent features, if implemented responsibly, are that it is distributed, trustless, immutable, and secure. This makes DLT an ideal candidate to meet the criteria of electronic trade documents set out in the Act.

Read more

‘Social value’ procurement rules are an absurd waste of time and money

Tunnelling for the Euston link finally kicks off this week.

Yet the Act also leaves breathing room by not naming blockchain, or any other technology. This is welcome – especially considering the rapid evolution of new innovations. 

The benefits to be gained from electronic trade documents vs. paper are ones that those who champion digitisation will be familiar with. Efficiency gains in faster transfer times improve the international trade ecosystem as a whole and can lower costs.

The International Chamber of Commerce estimated that digitalising trade documents could generate $25 billion in new economic growth by 2024, and free up $250 billion in efficiency savings. With the secure recording and immutability (identifiability and integrity in the Act’s criteria) the trade documents will be able to be traced and verified with greater ease. 

Reduction of paper use also benefits the environment and can support both the UK and other jurisdictions in meeting their net zero targets.

The World Economic Forum estimated a potential for 12% reduction in carbon emissions through digitisation of trade. Yet it is only through the network effect of global changes that these benefits can be gained, and international trading can truly become faster, greener, cheaper and more efficient.

Encouragingly, these global changes are already starting to take place, and the law will not be only one of its kind. It is based on the model law on electronic transfer records (MLETR) passed in 2017 by the UN International Trade group and other countries around the world are already considering how to implement this principle. 

This means that in the UK, we have a unique opportunity. While this Act may be, as Lord Holmes put it, “the most important law you have never heard of”, it isn’t going to carry itself out. The Act only allows electronic trade documents to be used, it does not force companies to make the switch. Industry now has a choice in their implementation, and the UK has the chance to be a market leader in driving these changes as the first G7 country to implement the principle set out by the UN’s MLETR. 

It is now up to both the public and private sector to enact the changes that the law enables. Let’s move from paper trade documents into the digital future and lead the way globally towards a modernised international trade ecosystem.

Read more

On this day: the birth of press freedom

Black and white illustration of the Crown v. Zenger trial, featuring lawyers and observers in a courtroom.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Blockbeat

Categories

  • Crypto Industry Voices

Trending Articles

  • As it happened: FTSE 100 drops as oil prices rise after Trump makes Hormuz threat

  • Jobless Banquet: Youth unemployment surge ‘sends Neets to KFC’

  • US bond market jitters spark UK economy recession warning

  • Monzo chair makes early exit after boardroom rift

  • Aldi boss wades into supermarket ‘price-gouging’ row

More from Morning Wire

  • ‘Social value’ procurement rules are an absurd waste of time and money

    Economics
    Tunnelling for the Euston link finally kicks off this week.
  • On this day: the birth of press freedom

    Opinion
    Black and white illustration of the Crown v. Zenger trial, featuring lawyers and observers in a courtroom.
  • TikTok loses court battle over £12.7m child privacy fine

    Tech
    Tiktok appeals to overturn US ban in a broader battle for tech regulation
  • European Commissioner vows to probe Fifa sell-off amid furious backlash

    Sport Business
    Gianni Infantino takes a selfie with Donald Trump, Claudia Sheinbaum, and a man in a suit.
  • Neurodiversity, employment law and ‘reasonable adjustments’ – the new HR headache

    Law
    Four brown puppies playing on a green mat with pink toys and a paw-print blanket.
  • BM3EAC Corp. 2026 Semi-Annual Report

    Business Wire
  • Foxtons hits out at Renters’ Rights Act as profit halves

    Property
    Foxtons is London's largest lettings agency brand
  • Senior exec layoffs surge as firms brace for major employment law change

    Business
    Businessman eating lunch outdoors in Canada financial district
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook