Skip to content
Saturday 29 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,824.26
+0.29%
DAX
26,569.99
+0.77%
CAC 40
8,401.18
+0.98%
STOXX 50
6,485.67
+0.95%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Monday 08 April 2019 7:59 am  |  Updated:  Monday 03 June 2019 12:13 am

Sadiq Khan’s ill-conceived pollution plan only threatens London’s push to go green

By: Katherine Denham

Add as a preferred source on Google

From today, all private hire drivers in London will have to pay the daily £11.50 congestion charge when driving in central London.

This is an enormous financial burden for some of the city’s lower paid workers – costing nearly £3,000 a year for a driver earning around £25,000. It's also hugely unfair for operators, many of which are being forced to increase fares so that their drivers don’t have to meet the added cost.

In fact, the entire plan from the mayor’s office and Transport for London (TfL) is ill-conceived and premature in its implementation.

Don’t get me wrong, we are supportive of the mayor’s stated aim to reduce pollution and congestion in order to improve public health in London. As a business, we use the latest vehicle technology to ensure that our fleet emits the least possible pollution.

However, the mayor is rushing towards his goal of an emission-free London without there being adequate infrastructure for, nor supply of, zero-emission vehicles. Neither London’s charging network, nor the world’s car manufacturers, are currently able to support the mayor in his ambitions.

While a lot of progress has been made, the private hire industry simply cannot keep up, and there are serious questions about whether some operators will be able to remain afloat commercially with the new rule in place.

There are tens of thousands of private hire vehicles operating on the streets of London, and we have the largest fleet of zero-emission cars in the UK. If it were possible to have a fleet made up solely of zero-emission vehicles, we would be the first to do so.

However, neither London nor our industry is ready yet. The pure electric models on the market are either too expensive, too small, or don’t have sufficient range. And for drivers whose earnings are dependent on minimising time between fares, these vehicles take too long to charge. There also aren’t enough fast charging points at the right locations across London.

Added to this, from January 2020, all new private-hire vehicles will have to be zero-emission capable. This means that from January 2020, Toyota Prius and other popular private hire vehicles, which are low-emission but not zero-emission capable, will no longer be accepted for private hire licences by TfL.

As such, all TfL-licensed operators and owner drivers will have to replace their current fleet with zero-emission vehicles that are more expensive and less fit for purpose.

We feel that companies like ours are being punished without being given the opportunity to avoid the consequences. And the irony is that black taxis, which emit 26 per cent of London’s deadly particulate matter, and whose fares are often twice the cost of private hire vehicles, are exempt from this new charge.

The proposed “electric vehicle revolution” is a great vision, but the current plan is without the necessary foundations. In reality, Khan’s new policy is unsustainable, and actually harms the broader “green” cause.

Customers will be left to bemoan the green initiative; they will doubtless equate the added costs and reduction in affordable transport options to the environmental agenda, rather than TfL’s back-to-front implementation.

If the infrastructure and vehicles were in place, we’d be the first to support this initiative. But imposing a new charge on an industry without the possibility of meaningful compliance, is nothing more than a tax.

As the pioneers of environmentally-friendly transport in London, that is a particularly bitter pill to swallow.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Transport & Infrastructure

Related Topics

  • London business
  • Tax
  • Transport for London

Trending Articles

  • Pensioners to hand over bank statements in government benefits crackdown

  • Jamie Carragher: HMRC petitions for Sky Sports star to be declared bankrupt

  • Brewdog founder James Watt hits out at ‘total silence’ over new venture

  • Lloyds Bank and Halifax users unable to use app in latest outage

  • As it happened: FTSE 100 falls but Nasdaq soars after Nvidia sales boom

More from Morning Wire

  • A global tram renaissance is underway. Why isn’t London jumping on board?

    Opinion
    London tram 1925 with Last Tram Week sign in front of the Houses of Parliament and Big Ben, 1952.
  • Hammersmith Bridge is a test for Burnham’s place-based growth

    Opinion
    Hammersmith Bridge closed in 2021 with fencing, banners, and traffic cones blocking access to the walkway.
  • Give London power to level up the rest of the country

    Opinion
    Business professionals in formal attire engaged in a lively discussion at a corporate meeting in a modern office setting.
  • When the City unites: Why this year’s City Giving Day matters more than ever

    Partner
    Group of people, including two aldermen, holding City Giving Day balloons at an event.
  • Jenrick: Welfare cuts worth £50bn allows us to ‘sustainably pay’ triple lock pension

    Politics
    Robert Jenrick speaking at a podium with BRITAIN NEEDS REFORM sign, delivering a speech.
  • Which is the smelliest Tube line?

    Opinion
    Passenger wearing a blue surgical mask and coat on a London Underground train.
  • London AI car firm records surge in revenue on demand for driver-tracking software

    Tech
    Seeing Machines Guardian device mounted on a desk, with a computer monitor in the background.
  • Nottingham Forest owner Marinakis sues Crystal Palace for defamation

    Sport Business
    Evangelos Marinakis, owner of Nottingham Forest, in a dark jacket and white shirt, looking serious at a stadium.
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook