Skip to content
Sunday 6 September 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE · FR
MorningWire

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,831.09
0.00%
DAX
26,046.40
+0.17%
CAC 40
8,278.77
-0.09%
STOXX 50
6,392.93
+0.16%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceEU InstitutionsCompetitionPublic AffairsBankingTechnologyEnergy
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Monday 19 June 2023 6:30 am  |  Updated:  Sunday 18 June 2023 10:11 pm

Adam Smith 300: Adam Smith Institute founder Dr Eamonn Butler on how morality guided the father of economics

By: Rainer Zitelmann

Add as a preferred source on Google

Nobody changed the dismal science of economics quite like Adam Smith, the Scottish philosopher, author of The Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments, and father of market economics. June marks the 300th anniversary of Smith’s baptism – nobody quite knows his actual birthday – and to mark the occasion, German historian and sociologist Dr Rainer Zitelmann interviewed Dr Eamonn Butler, the founder of London’s Adam Smith Institute, on Smith’s life and work.

Dr Rainer Zitelmann: If you were to highlight the single most important thought in all of Smith’s work, what would it be?

Dr Eamonn Butler: The Wealth of Nations contains so many insights that changed our thinking that it is hard to single out any one of them. In the very first paragraph, for example, he invents the notion of GDP and then he goes on to describe the division of labour, the benefits of free commerce, and so many more new concepts including the Invisible Hand idea. But to answer your question, I would plump for his insight in The Theory of Moral Sentiments that human morality is driven by sympathy – our desire as social creatures to act in ways that bring the approval of others and to avoid actions that others disapprove of. It’s a very powerful idea, an evolutionary idea that was a century ahead of Darwin.

Dr Rainer Zitelmann: That sense of sympathy is interesting. Why does Smith not explicitly refer to the entrepreneur, who above all must be empathetic in order to develop and sell a product?

Dr Eamonn Butler: When he wrote The Theory of Moral Sentiments in 1759 he was a college professor with little experience of the business world. So that is hardly surprising. But interestingly, I have been asked to give talks on the relevance of Smith’s ethics to entrepreneurship and business, and his moral ideas are indeed very relevant. Take, for example, his emphasis on the virtue of prudence. Prudence means acting in your own best interest – your long-term interest, not what may seem good at the time (like keeping healthy rather than lazing on the sofa with beer and pizza). That’s entirely true in business. You do not build a business by trying to make a quick buck out of people, but in building up reputation for giving customers what they want and need. Customers will come back only if they trust you and see that you have integrity and good reputation.

Dr Rainer Zitelmann:What significance does the theme of poverty have in Smith’s work? Would you agree with me when I say that Adam Smith’s primary concern was to show the way out of poverty?

Dr Eamonn Butler: Definitely. Smith supported free trade and free commerce for the same reason I do, namely that it is the best way of improving the condition of the working poor – or more properly, the best way to allow the working poor to better their own condition. Bettering your condition, he thought, is a natural human desire, but it is too often blocked by onerous taxes and regulations imposed by people in authority. And too often, those rules are deliberately proposed by established businesspeople who want to keep out any competition, and imposed by their friends and cronies in government. Sweep that away, says Smith, and the ’system of natural liberty’ will bring prosperity to all.

Read more

Starling plans to ‘come out swinging’ in diversification bid

Smiling woman, potentially Starling CEO, over city skyline with STARLING branding

Dr Rainer Zitelmann: Authors like Samuel Fleischacker and Elizabeth Anderson tend to associate Smith with leftist, even egalitarian values. Is this a distortion of Smith? Where do these authors have a point and where are they wrong? Did Smith perhaps attach greater importance to the state
than you and I would?

Dr Eamonn Butler: Smith was certainly motivated largely by the condition of the working poor. And he of course wrote that no country could count itself as prosperous if the greater part of the population was poor. So to that extent his motives are the same as those of the left. His solutions, however, are the exact opposite of theirs. Rather than arguing that the state should have more power in order to improve the lot of the poorest, he argues the exact opposite – that it is the oppression of those in authority that constrains the ambition of the poor and keeps them in poverty. His solution, therefore, is to set the people free of
all that.

Dr Rainer Zitelmann: To a modern reader, Smith’s books, especially The Theory of Moral Sentiments, are more reminiscent of self-help books (like Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends) than of modern economic texts, in which you largely find a lot of mathematical calculations and formulas. ‘Moral philosophy’ was, after all, also more concerned with teaching about human behaviour.

Dr Eamonn Butler: The point had not occurred to me, but yes, Smith’s analysis of the human mind is drawn from innumerable practical examples of real-live dilemmas. In The Theory of Moral Sentiments it is about what one might feel and think and do when faced with a moral problem, in The Wealth of Nations it is about the incentives that draw people into one economic action rather than another. So yes, they are very relevant for those who want to understand their own minds and put their thoughts and actions on a rational foundation.

Dr Rainer Zitelmann: More generally, if Smith were able to look down at us from heaven today and say something about our modern world, what do you think he would say?

Dr Eamonn Butler: It is always unwise to speculate about what an 18th-century character would say about our 20th-century lives. But I will break my rule. He would, of course, be amazed by the wealth around in the world and the sheer number of goods and services that are available, even to the poorest people in the developed countries. We are 50 or 100 times richer today than people were in Smith’s time. But equally, when he reviewed the laws and regulations that constrain our every action and cripple our enterprise, and when he discovered that governments routinely take 40 or 50 per cent of the nation’s product for their own purposes, he would undoubtedly conclude that we are, regrettably, living under the most profound tyranny.

Read more

Top economists shun Burnham over wealth taxes

Andy Burnham speaking at a press conference, expressing confidence despite challenges, highlighting leadership and resilie...

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News

Categories

  • Economics

Trending Articles

  • Victoria Beckham owed £350,000 by Harvey Nichols

  • Iceland boss Richard Walker vows to set up shop on Falkland Islands

  • Don’t underestimate the free trade agreement Britain just joined

  • As it happened: FTSE 100 wavers as weak housebuilding drives faster construction downturn

  • M&G: FTSE 100 giant hits out at Rayner’s ground rent cap as it suffers loss

More from Morning Wire

  • Starling plans to ‘come out swinging’ in diversification bid

    Fintech
    Smiling woman, potentially Starling CEO, over city skyline with STARLING branding
  • Top economists shun Burnham over wealth taxes

    Politics
    Andy Burnham speaking at a press conference, expressing confidence despite challenges, highlighting leadership and resilie...
  • Jenrick pledges reform for small businesses

    Politics
    Robert Jenrick speaking at a podium with BRITISH WORKERS FIRST displayed, gesturing with his right hand.
  • Gary Stevenson is right, rich people want to help Britain – here’s how to let them do it

    Opinion
    Gary Stevenson debates economist Dr Kristian Niemietz on wealth tax issues during a live event.
  • Here’s how Britain can woo back the world’s wealthy

    Opinion
    Image of yachts in a marina - the boats have traditionally been the preserve of the super rich
  • Britain knows how to seed a scaleup. But can it back one all the way?

    Partner
    Panelists discuss Scaleup Champions: Capital & Collaboration at SCALEEXPOSUMMIT, with sponsor logos visible.
  • Dante Mayfair at Claridge’s review: How about a five-martini dinner?

    Life&Style
    Elegant Dante Mayfair dining room with green booths, marble tables, floral centerpiece, and stained glass ceiling.
  • An overly complicated tax system is holding the UK back

    Opinion
    Inheritance tax receipts are on track for a record breaking year
MorningWire

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe

Business

  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Regulation
  • Competition
  • Public Affairs

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About Morning Wire
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 Morning Wire Ltd · Published by Morning Wire Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook