European business, markets and politics
A UK employment tribunal ruling lets Next keep higher pay for warehouse staff, a move the company says protects retail jobs.

Next has secured a victory at the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), which upheld the retailer’s right to pay its warehouse operatives a higher basic rate than store assistants. The decision ends a six‑year legal battle brought by more than 3,500 current and former employees who argued the pay gap discriminated against women, who predominantly work on the shop floor.
The case sits at the intersection of gender‑pay equity and the labour market pressures facing UK retailers. Next warned that overturning the appeal would have dealt "a hammer blow" to retail employment, a sector already grappling with staffing shortages and rising living costs.
Leigh Day, representing the claimants, noted that the original Employment Tribunal had found store workers performed work of equal value to warehouse staff but were paid less. While the EAT dismissed the cross‑appeal on that point, it left the discrimination findings on night‑time, overtime and rest‑break pay intact.
"This judgment has come at the right time, the UK economy desperately needs jobs and the loss of this appeal would have represented a hammer blow to retail employment in the UK," the company said.
Leigh Day described the outcome as "mixed" and said it will seek permission to appeal the EAT’s decision on basic pay. Partner Elizabeth George warned that allowing market rates to justify pay gaps could set a precedent that entrenches discrimination.
Beyond Next, the firm has filed similar equal‑pay claims against major chains such as Asda, Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Morrisons and Co‑op, covering over 100,000 workers. The sector may see a wave of litigation as employees test the limits of pay‑justification arguments.
Analysts will watch whether Next proceeds with an appeal and how the case influences wage policies across high‑street retailers. The broader debate about balancing competitive pay with gender‑fairness is likely to shape future employment law reforms.
For a view of how job security concerns are playing out in other UK industries, see the Jaguar Land Rover redundancy talks.